XiNeutrino's picture

Moon Base Now


What? Moon base now? Don't you follow the news? Constellation has been cancelled! Yes, and I understand the confusion and consternation, but the most logical first step in getting ready to reach out into our solar system will be to develop a full-scale assembly and launch facility within a low-gravity environment. I nominate the Moon.

In his briefing before the National Press Club, Administrator Bolden implied that we will be going to the Moon despite the acknowledged demise of Constellation.  When we go, and under what arrangement will depend on three important bodies; the White House, The Congress, and a NASA-Private Sector-International partnership. Partnerships are a sharing arrangement in both benefits and costs.  This is the key to a renewed and expanded Moon mission that is completely designed as a stepping stone from which humankind will leap out into the solar system.

This is the "missing goal" that everyone is talking about; actually griping about! We need to turn our disappointment into an energizer of this mission.  We do not wait!  We take advantage of Congress' rants and snarls during the budgeting process and get them focused on this mission concept.  Who are we?  We are SpaceTweeps and we must now begin to organize the biggest, most important and most vital tweetup in our history.

NASA, ESA, and the private sector must be made aware of the rising public support for the Moon base mission.  How do we get rising public support?  Again, SpaceTweeps band together and use the Internet to drive home both the idea and to stimulate its full support.

We have resources and design visions that come from both our earlier space missions and our initial work on Constellation.The original program is cancelled, but the ideas, concepts and technology are NOT! The "i" in America stands for "innovation" and that is exactly what we must demand from the White House, the Congress and the new space exploration partnership discussed above.

So, lets get started. Lets get with folks like Neal Wiser and his SaveNASA site to begin to launch a full-fledged advocacy for this concept.  I hope you agree.  I hope you will join in.  We cannot wait, we must start immediately and it must be ceaseless, precise, and most of all from our hearts.  We can win.  You do believe that don't you?  You do want us to go into space in this century, right?  Well.....?

johnmknight's picture
Any government funded Moon mission must be part of a larger and more challenging goal, ie Mars or NEOs. The Moon offers a close (3 days) low gravity environ for testing hardware, systems, and people. What most non-SpaceTweeps don't realize is the integral and dovetailing nature of Mercury, Gemini and Apollo mission all had to culminate to what was accomplished on 7/20/69. Moon missions need to be put in the proper context for people to understand their important role. I wouldn't expect a Congressmen or taxpayer to get excited about "putting two men in a tin can and docking with an Agena stage", yet, without the Gemini program, there would be no Apollo. 
XiNeutrino's picture
Thank you and of course I agree with your assessment.  We need to stimulate that assessment in Congress and the WH.
fizzviic's picture

Mr. Knight is correct.  Each program built on the former and expanded the envelope of knowledge and capability.  Mercury proved humans could function in orbit, a thought some at the time deemed impossible.  The Gemini program expanded both the size of the vehicle to accommodate a crew of two and ultimately proved the feasibility of rendezvous and docking,  Apollo drew on the lessons learned in both programs and was ultimately successful in "landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to earth."

In my opinion it is vital to our long range presence in space that we learn to function for long durations in low gravity and to learn to "live off the land" so to speak.  We can spend upwards of six months at a time on the ISS, learning much, but there is no possibility of using this small outpost as a springboard to Mars.

I believe that a human presence on the moon, building an infrastructure to support long-term off earth capability is a must.


XiNeutrino's picture
Thank you for your comment.  I know you have been there are seen exactly what you stress in your message.  We need to carry that message up to DC - LOUDLY ;-D


Thank you again.

I agree that the Moon is by far the easiest to get going with and the most forgiving when it comes to screwups (which will happen) but Mars has got the gold when it comes to where we should be headed next.
brobof's picture
"the most logical first step in getting ready to reach out into our solar system will be to develop a full-scale assembly and launch facility within a low-gravity environment. I nominate the Moon." Er... NO! EML1 has a much lower gravity and is the nearest node in the Interplanetary Super Highway. Even as a source of building materials; short of: Momentum Transfer Tethers; Launch Loops; Lunartrons or a Moon Stalk... the vast number of NEOs offer all sorts of materials esp CHON! Again without a gravity well. The Moon is fine for tourists and as a Nuclear Rocket research Facility (vide Orion Nuclear Pulse Rocket et al) and certain processes that need a modicum of gravity. But only until we can build large spinning structures and any level of 'gravity' we need. Why crawl back down into another Well (especially to build a Shipyard!) when we have spent the last 200,000 years getting out of this one! Anyway we have a Shipyard already! It's called the ISS. Lets use it.
-
"...all the Universe or nothing." Oswald Cabal ["Shape of Things to Come" U.K. 1936 (Dir. William Cameron Menzies)]