Space Tweeps here are some reflections on the Space Shuttle:

what lesson -- that fly boys and the aerospace industry hijacked the space program by insisting "pilots" had to "fly" into space?

the space shuttle has to be one of the MOST wasteful and deadly boondoggles ever foisted off on taxpayers in the name of science (nuclear power is worse still -- but hey, we need reactors to create weapons of mass destruction, so killing people is actually part of the plan there).

shuttles should have never been built and certainly deserve to be forgotten (unlike the lessons of greed and hubris that created them -- those we NEVER seem to learn.

I cross-posted my earlier essay on Endeavour's Launch and the End of an Era at Huffington Post. It went up in the Technology Section yesterday. The comment above was posted at HuffPost by Rusty Rebar. 

Anyone offended? I am (very). Anyone want to leave a counter comment at HuffPost? HERE is the link if you are so moved. I'm moved but I wrote the original essay so good 'ole Rusty knows where I'm coming from.

Jeff
negativereturn's picture
Wasteful,  deadly, boondoggles?, forgotten, NEVER, greed,

Someone buy this poor fellow some flowers and a puppy dog.

Dr. Jeff,

I never argue with someone with a closed mind.

-Todd

Jazifer's picture
Drunks and idiots - two varieties I rarely bother with. Anyone expressing this opinion has clearly got their mind made up or is trolling for a reaction. I won't bother linking this particular poster to the opinions I expressed on this site, as I doubt they would even care to get through the whole of paragraph one. Look at his other comments on subjects - all negative and moaning. HuffPost has been getting more and more of this, unfortunately, which is a shame because I used to like reading there.
Sadly there is a grain of truth to the above statement (boondoggle)  but it misses the point. The original intent of the STS was admirable but once politics and the military got through with the 'Decision' making it was doomed to the fate it's coming to today. The problem is the lack of long term vision and I know it's unpopular but I support the Augustine commission flexible option and the general concept of staying out of gravity wells until we get other aspects (heavy lift, long term mission life support, space tug vehicle) sorted out.

I posted this here once before but I encourage interested persons to watch the first couple at least of a lecture series from MIT open course ware ( http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Aeronautics-and-Astronautics/16-885JFall-2005/LectureNotes/index.htm ) for more detail on how  the next logical step after Apollo was over designed due to military requirements and under-funded due to political expediency. 

Don't get me wrong I love the STS and think it still is the most advanced spacecraft humanity has seen but she's an old bird and without radical new technology is not the best answer to get to orbit safely and economically. 

mdbenson's picture
Offended? I'm practically climbing over the back of the chair! Should we forget the 127 (and counting) successful flights, the science that has been performed, the building of ISS and relations with the US's international partners, all that has been achieved in the last 30 years?

30 years ago the Space Shuttle was the most advanced spacecraft mankind had ever built. Now it's old and the idea doesn't seem so great anymore, so we must move on. To brand it a waste and a boondoggle however is, in my opinion, to be blind and ignorant. Forgive my slight lack of knowledge of American slang, but I thought a boondoggle was an investment of time and money with little or no return. That's about as wrong as you could be about the 30 year Shuttle program.

Jeff, while I agree the comment is borderline offensive, I learned a long time ago you don't feed the trolls on the internet,they just multiply and get more stupid. Great thing about knowing someone's opinion is you are free to ignore it at your own pleasure :)

doctorjeff's picture
Mark- My problem is I learned the hard way that trolls need to be addressed. Truth is not often reality. *Perception* is reality. In fact, perception if believed by enough folks then becomes the 'new' truth. If trolls are ignored, and not put in their place by facts, then those who don't have the facts listen to them. Those that listen are voters, advocates, and not voiceless. The **worst** thing you can do with a troll with a platform is ignore them. Because others we want to reach are listening. It is not about changing the mind of a troll - not possible - it's about making sure they don't change the minds of others. -Jeff
-
Jeff Goldstein, Center Director National Center for Earth and Space Science Education http://ncesse.org
mdbenson's picture
Jeff - I guess it depends largely on wether the person trolling is genuinely ignorant of the facts or just posting BS to try and start a fight. It can be a hard call. I agree you need to set the record straight but a lot of people who just troll for attention and reactions won't accept reason and just end up flailing the community with flames and stupid behaviour. On some (sadly rare) occasions posting a reasoned, factual argument can sometimes put them straight and shut them up. Other times it can end up with them calling your mother names and being destructive.

Maybe this person is genuinely ignorant. Their language was ambiguous and their attitude stinks, I know that.


I remember reading about the space shuttle concepts and worried I would die before seeing such an incredible feat of engineering - I think I was 10 at the time.  I was so excited to see it, and it was so mind boggling, and I wanted so bad to see it, that I thought it was too good to live to see.  How could I agree with this person's perspective?  The Shuttle is a magnanimous achievement and, for those of us with a passion for Space Exploration and a heart for science, the journey has been an unbelievable ride.  Thank you, again, to all those who made incredible sacrifices for the advancement of our understanding and exploration of the final frontier.
Forgotten? Heck, no! If anything, the shuttles should be forgiven and respected.
jdpsyntelos's picture
Posted a reply ..

cheers

XiNeutrino's picture
Against total population counts, few people are born stupid. Now this fellow and his shuttle fuss could be one of those, but generally stupidity is cultivated from birth, through schooling, and into society.  So the challenge, it would seem, is to spend more time and effort raising public knowledge about the sciences; even when they fight to keep it away.

We talk about education reform, but the focus continues to overlook the system's infrastructure and management. This is where educational policy is fostered or strangled and where stupidity can be effectively cultivated.

So our shuttle hater, educated in a different environment, may very well have become an astronaut.  So maybe he is expressing a hidden message to all of us.

sumarimike's picture

I posted a reply on Huffington as well. One of the things that's been bothering me lately about the general political climate is the stark polarity of "Americans".  It seems more and more when a republican-type says "America" they mean the America of people that agree with their viewpoint, and Democrats do the same thing for their America. This polarity is my perception and is highly generalized, as reflected by what I see in the media. If you feel offended by my viewpoint, then you are an exception to it. :) 

So for me it's important to not shut off the opposition because I think they are stupid - because that is what they do to me. Instead, this is the part where I want to reach out and close the gap. Or at least reduce the fear some. I'm not entirely sure how to reach out well, and I'm not perfect at it yet, but each step is an experience in my natural mode of diplomacy. We need them on our side - or at least not fighting our side with factless ruthless abandon.

jdpsyntelos's picture
Yep, it's up to everyone wiling to see the positive and understand how to help.


Shuttle attitude will most certainly be useful on other planets when we eventually populate and learn a better standard of atmospherics regarding planetary evolution...

an example of modern atmospheric development and distribution is the use of perchlorates and recent NASA testing of other rocket fuel climatology distribusives...

The shuttles knowledge will be kept and the expertise will fly again!!!

The heavens await...

www.spacetravel21stcentury.blogspot.com/